IT Writers Awards
Voting
IT Writers Awards
|
Judges: Please read these notes before reviewing the entries. |
Revised 1:00 pm Thursday 15 February 2001
Contents
Voting forms
Introduction
Thankyou for taking part as a judge in the 2001 Consensus IT Writers Awards.
If you took part last year we hope you find the new format easier to work with.
We welcome your suggestions for further improvements. We recommend that you
download the blank
worksheet as a PDF, and then print copies as required, or if you prefer, cut and paste
the form as reproduced below. Please submit or email your completed
voting form(s) to us no later than 16 February 2001.
Judging
procedure
We have found by experience that the following procedure will speed your
deliberations.
1. Read through all of the entries in your assigned category in the order listed on the web at least once before attempting to score an article.
2. On the second reading use the supplied marking sheet to record your notes and scores for each article against each of the listed judging criteria.
3. After completing the second reading total the scores for each article and rank the articles according to the aggregate scores.
4. Compare and consider the relative positions of the articles and adjust the ranking based on your overall assessment and professional judgement.
5. Complete the voting form for the category by starting with the number one (1) as your highest score numbering each entry through to your lowest score (highest number).
6. Add your judges ID number and your own security number, save a copy of the form for your records, and submit the form.
We recommend that you download a copy of the worksheet
(Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader V4.0)
|
Consensus
IT Writers Awards |
|||
|
Title of article |
|
||
|
Author |
|
||
|
Category |
|
||
|
Notes |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Scores |
|||
|
Criteria |
Description |
Sub-total |
Total |
|
Subject Matter |
up to 10 Points |
||
|
Topic of importance/interest (at time of publication) |
|
|
|
|
Content |
up to 40 points |
||
|
Informative |
new information by research or investigation |
|
|
|
Convincing |
command of subject matter, depth of understanding. Commitment |
|
|
|
Balanced |
arguments, points of view |
|
|
|
Sub Total |
|
|
|
|
Style |
up to 40 points |
||
|
Original |
|
|
|
|
Clear |
|
|
|
|
Engaging |
want to read more? |
|
|
|
Sub Total |
|
|
|
|
Overall Impression |
up to 10 points |
||
|
Sub Total |
|
|
|
|
Total score out of 100 points |
|
||
Award categories not listed above will be determined by the judges when they meet in conference on 20 February 2001.
End of Forms
Design & Copyright2004©Consensus Pty Ltd
This web-site uses frames, click here for the full picture